<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JavaScript Developer, the ingredient list</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.standardpixel.com/2008/07/03/javascript-developer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.standardpixel.com/2008/07/03/javascript-developer/</link>
	<description>Agile Web Development</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave O</title>
		<link>http://blog.standardpixel.com/2008/07/03/javascript-developer/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 00:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.standardpixel.com/?p=22#comment-115</guid>
		<description>I can give you one reason for the difficulty in finding someone  good at your first and second points, and your fifth point -- some of the most talented folks on the fifth point generally shun JS-based workarounds for issues they can solve without it, and that tends to translate into an interpretation of JS use as a failure of some kind. Similarly, when someone comes to JS first, there's a tendency I've seen to solve problems with JS instead of markup/css, and so those folks never delve truly deeply into the fifth point stuff. At the end of the day, only some folks (like you, which I know from working with you, heh) have such a strong interest in this stuff that you do it in your spare time, and the challenge of focusing on all the points is a feature instead of a bug. But, as you suggest, such people are rare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can give you one reason for the difficulty in finding someone  good at your first and second points, and your fifth point &#8212; some of the most talented folks on the fifth point generally shun JS-based workarounds for issues they can solve without it, and that tends to translate into an interpretation of JS use as a failure of some kind. Similarly, when someone comes to JS first, there&#8217;s a tendency I&#8217;ve seen to solve problems with JS instead of markup/css, and so those folks never delve truly deeply into the fifth point stuff. At the end of the day, only some folks (like you, which I know from working with you, heh) have such a strong interest in this stuff that you do it in your spare time, and the challenge of focusing on all the points is a feature instead of a bug. But, as you suggest, such people are rare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
